To Blog or Not to Blog…
We braved the elements yesterday to create these shots to promote ‘A View From The Bridge’. Actors Crystal Bates, Simon King and Scott Westwood endured the bitter cold and driving rain (just like New York in December) and photographer Andrew Bainbridge did the rest:
This is a great competition idea from the RSC – write your own love poem or even Love Tweet!
Great start to the day as Metro have included our production of Talking to Terrorists in their weekly “Critic’s Choice: Stage Shows Worth Seeing”. Of the show it says:
“Starting out at The Royal Court, this affecting piece came about from interviews with people directly affected by terrorism as hostages, journalists or victims. Spoken verbatim by the actors of The Crescent Theatre the result is a hugely powerful piece of theatre.”
You may be aware there is government legislation (The Terrorism Act 2006) which makes it a criminal offence to make “a statement that is likely to be understood by some or all of the members of the public to whom it is published as a direct or indirect encouragement or other inducement to them to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences.”
If you’re interested and can’t sleep very well you might like to take a look at all the offences covered:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/ukpga_20060011_en_2#pt1-pb1-l1g1
What’s most concerning is the wording “likely to be understood by some”. How can we legislate for the inference or meaning taken by an individual? Poor old Dunkin’ Donuts – they’d be doing a 7 year stretch if they’d run their seemingly innocent ad campaign from 2008 in the UK:
So where does that leave us? Are we in breach of the Act? Presumably the more incendiary amongst us may see the words ‘Terrorism’ or Terrorists’ and take it as an immediate green light to take up arms! The very words seem to carry a great deal of power these days – but do they really persuade people to commit the very acts they describe? Surely that’s absurd?
I’m lucky enough to have been cast in ‘Talking to Terrorists’ and I’m delighted to be part of it. The play grabbed my attention as soon as I heard about it. A play that literally ‘voices’ the words of people (very ordinary people) who have become terrorists and starts to give some explanation for their actions? That had to be worth a look. So of course I read the script and couldn’t put it down (the bath water went cold…)
Our job as actors is to attempt to reproduce, communicate and convey the words of real people – with the same inflexion, hesitation, emotion, accent and meaning that was originally intended. This is a very different technique and leaves you with a responsibility and challenge that’s very different to the norm. Which is why I’m so excited to be part of it.
It’s really very rare to hear verbatim the words of people who have committed such violent, abhorrent acts. Or those people who are deeply affected by them. Or those who are in a position where they must negotiate and reach some kind of settlement with people who are generally seen as beneath contempt.
What’s really chilling though, is that some of the terrorists we meet in this play are really not that different to you or me. The difference is, through particular circumstance, desperation and the belief they really have no other choice – because their voices are not heard – these people resort to acts of extreme violence.
It’s an uncomfortable thought, but we’re never too far away from committing acts of terror ourselves – take away our loved ones, our liberty, our food, our dignity – what would we do? How would we respond if we felt no-one was listening? If there appeared to be no justice forthcoming?
As a child growing up in the seventies, I clearly remember the horrific reports of IRA terror attacks, the murders of civilians, the assassination of establishment figures and of course the Brighton Bomb. I had no idea why they were happening, just that the IRA were the bad guys who should be punished severely.
Working in London in the eighties and nineties, the Tube closing due to a bomb scare was commonplace. The view of the media was clear – the IRA were evil fanatics. To even attempt to rationalise or examine their motives was tantamount to approval. Yet, at least we knew who to despise.
Now of course we’re engaged in ‘A War on Terror‘. We’re none of us too sure who we’re at war with and what we’re fighting exactly. There’s no particular country to aim our hatred. The ‘enemy’ is not at all obvious. The reasons behind it all aren’t clear either.
What is clear however is that to have achieved any progress in eradicating terrorist activity in the past, talking had to take place. As Mo Mowlam said, you have to talk to terrorists. Uncomfortable but true.
Recent Comments